Current:Home > reviewsFormer Massachusetts school superintendent pleads guilty to sending threatening texts -BeyondProfit Compass
Former Massachusetts school superintendent pleads guilty to sending threatening texts
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-07 08:19:11
CHICOPEE, Mass. (AP) — The former superintendent of the Chicopee Public Schools in Massachusetts pleaded guilty Tuesday to lying to federal agents investigating 99 threatening text messages sent to a candidate for police chief in 2021, prosecutors said Tuesday.
Lynn Clark, 53, of Belchertown, pleaded guilty to two counts of making false statements. U.S. District Court Judge Mark Mastroianni has scheduled sentencing for April 30.
Chicopee, a city of about 55,000 residents roughly 80 miles (130 kilometers) west of Boston, was in the process of hiring a new police chief in December 2021 when law enforcement received a report that a candidate for the job had received texts from unknown numbers that seemed intended to force them to withdraw, prosecutors said.
The candidate pulled their application, and the city delayed the selection process. Clark was charged in April, 2022 and removed from her duties as superintendent a few weeks later.
Investigators said about 99 threatening messages threatening “reputational harm” were sent from fictitious phone numbers purchased through a mobile app. Phone and internet records revealed the numbers were purchased by Clark and that the accounts sent each of the threatening messages.
Investigators said Clark falsely said she received threatening text messages from unknown phone numbers, when, in fact, she sent the messages to herself.
She also falsely named other city workers who she felt may be responsible for sending the messages, according to prosecutors. They said Clark also denied that she had downloaded a mobile app with which she purchased the fictitious phone numbers to send the messages.
Clark later admitted that she sent the messages and downloaded the app, prosecutors said.
The charges of making false statements each carry a sentence of up to five years in prison, up to one year of supervised release, and a fine of up to $10,000.
veryGood! (3545)
Related
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Get a Mess-Free Tan and Save $21 on the Isle of Paradise Glow Clear Self-Tanning Mousse
- In historic move, Biden nominates Adm. Lisa Franchetti as first woman to lead Navy
- Possible Vanderpump Rules Spin-Off Show Is Coming
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Newly elected United Auto Workers leader strikes militant tone ahead of contract talks
- How Climate and the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Undergirds the Ukraine-Russia Standoff
- In the Democrats’ Budget Package, a Billion Tons of Carbon Cuts at Stake
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Margot Robbie Channels OG Barbie With Sexy Vintage Look
Ranking
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Twitter labels NPR's account as 'state-affiliated media,' which is untrue
- AI companies agree to voluntary safeguards, Biden announces
- Louisville appoints Jacquelyn Gwinn-Villaroel as first Black woman to lead its police department
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Illinois Now Boasts the ‘Most Equitable’ Climate Law in America. So What Will That Mean?
- The math behind Dominion Voting System's $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox News
- More states enacting laws to allow younger teens to serve alcohol, report finds
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Your banking questions, answered
Twitter labels NPR's account as 'state-affiliated media,' which is untrue
White House to establish national monument honoring Emmett Till
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
The life and possible death of low interest rates
Chicago Mayor Slow to Act on Promises to Build Green Economy by Repurposing Polluted Industrial Sites
Two Md. Lawmakers Demand Answers from Environmental Regulators. The Hogan Administration Says They’ll Have to Wait