Current:Home > ScamsColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -BeyondProfit Compass
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-12 20:59:43
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (75)
Related
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Inside Daisy Kelliher and Gary King's Tense BDSY Reunion—And Where They Stand Today
- FDA upgrades recall of eggs linked to salmonella to 'serious' health risks or 'death'
- SpaceX launch: Europe's Hera spacecraft on way to study asteroid Dimorphos
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- NASA, SpaceX delay launch to study Jupiter’s moon Europa as Hurricane Milton approaches
- Eviction prevention in Los Angeles helps thousands, including landlords
- Jalen Milroe lost Heisman, ACC favors Miami lead college football Week 6 overreactions
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- TikToker Taylor Rousseau Grigg’s Husband Speaks Out After Her Death
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Opinion: Browns need to bench Deshaun Watson, even though they refuse to do so
- TikToker Taylor Rousseau Grigg Detailed Health Struggles in One of Her Final Videos Before Her Death
- Buccaneers plan to evacuate to New Orleans with Hurricane Milton approaching
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Another aide to New York City mayor resigns amid federal probe
- Kamala Harris, Donald Trump tied amongst bettors for election win after VP debate
- 'Joker: Folie à Deux' underwhelms at the box office, receives weak audience scores
Recommendation
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
NFL games today: Start time, TV info for Sunday's Week 5 matchups
New 'Menendez Brothers' documentary features interviews with Erik and Lyle 'in their own words'
New York Liberty end Las Vegas Aces' three-peat bid, advance to WNBA Finals
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
'Joker: Folie à Deux' underwhelms at the box office, receives weak audience scores
How did the Bills lose to Texans? Baffling time management decisions cost Buffalo
North Carolina residents impacted by Helene likely to see some voting changes