Current:Home > InvestSignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:Pennsylvania Senate passes bill opponents worry targets books about LGBTQ+ and marginalized people -BeyondProfit Compass
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:Pennsylvania Senate passes bill opponents worry targets books about LGBTQ+ and marginalized people
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-09 23:29:09
HARRISBURG,SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center Pa. (AP) — A bill passed the GOP-controlled state Senate to require Pennsylvania parents to opt in their children to access book deemed sexually explicit after more than an hour of passionate floor debate Tuesday.
The bill passed 29-21, with objection from most Democrats. It now goes onto the Democrat-controlled House, where it faces an uncertain future. The bill passed the chamber, along with another that regulated how teachers communicate with parents about curricula, and drew opposition from the state’s largest teachers union.
The move is part of a larger nationwide effort of expanding parental oversight of schools, which saw a swell of energy in Florida last year. In the months since, other state Legislatures have taken up similar legislation that opponents say specifically targets LGBTQ+ and students of color.
In Pennsylvania, the bill’s sponsor, Republican Sen. Ryan Aument of Lancaster County, said the bill was a “very measured approach to addressing what was rapidly becoming a contentious national issue.” He rejected that it was an attempt to ban books, attack the LGBTQ+ community or censor anyone.
One Democrat, Sen. Lisa Boscola of Northampton County, agreed, saying policies like this draw heated, vocal support on both sides of the issue.
“It’s tearing our communities apart,” she said. “That’s why this General Assembly needs to lead. It needs to set forth a statewide policy that balances those radically different viewpoints of parents on both sides of this issue.”
Under the Pennsylvania measure, a similar version of which also passed the chamber last year, districts would identify and list books that contain any sexual material — used in classroom instruction or available in the library — and require parents sign an opt-in form to grant permission for their children to access some books.
It defines sexually explicit as showing “acts of masturbation, sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality or physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or, if the person is a female, breast.”
The measure would also prohibit depictions of nudity in books for students in kindergarten through grade eight.
Opponents denied that the legislation wouldn’t ultimately censor voices, and said books available in school are vetted by educators. They said parents already have the ability to control what their children read.
“Exploring human relationships, sex and love are some of the most challenging and rewarding obstacles that we will face in life,” said Democratic Sen. Amanda Cappelletti, of Montgomery County. “And we need the right education and materials available to ensure people can explore those spaces safely and with the right knowledge to be able to interact with the world around them compassionately.”
Another bill — a similar version of which was vetoed by former Gov. Tom Wolf last year — that considered what it calls “classroom transparency” also passed the chamber, 28-22. That measure would require schools to post online the title or link for every textbook used, syllabi and course summaries and the state academic standards for the course.
Democrats said schools already allow for parents to review curriculum, and the legislation would be needlessly burdensome on districts.
The bill’s sponsor, Republican Sen. Doug Mastriano of Franklin County, said there was “nothing nefarious” about the bill’s intent.
Both measures were opposed by the Pennsylvania State Education Association.
__
Brooke Schultz is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
veryGood! (73967)
Related
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- 6 doctors swallowed Lego heads for science. Here's what came out
- See Blake Lively Transform Into Redheaded Lily Bloom in First Photos From It Ends With Us Set
- To reignite the joy of childhood, learn to live on 'toddler time'
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Most Americans say overturning Roe was politically motivated, NPR/Ipsos poll finds
- When gun violence ends young lives, these men prepare the graves
- Climate Activist Escapes Conviction in Action That Shut Down 5 Pipelines
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Fraud Plagues Major Solar Subsidy Program in China, Investigation Suggests
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Sam Asghari Speaks Out Against “Disgusting” Behavior Toward Wife Britney Spears
- How Trump’s ‘Secret Science’ Rule Would Put Patients’ Privacy at Risk
- Nicole Richie Shares Rare Glimpse of 15-Year-Old Daughter Harlow in Family Photo
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Dakota Access Pipeline: Army Corps Is Ordered to Comply With Trump’s Order
- Justin Long and Kate Bosworth Are Married One Month After Announcing Engagement
- Why Trump didn't get a mugshot — and wasn't even technically arrested — at his arraignment
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Iowa Alzheimer's care facility is fined $10,000 after pronouncing a living woman dead
A police dog has died in a hot patrol car for the second time in a week
Police officer who shot 11-year-old Mississippi boy suspended without pay
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
New Apps for Solar Installers Providing Competitive Edge
This winter's U.S. COVID surge is fading fast, likely thanks to a 'wall' of immunity
Can Trump still become president if he's convicted of a crime or found liable in a civil case?