Current:Home > InvestHere's why all your streaming services cost a small fortune now -BeyondProfit Compass
Here's why all your streaming services cost a small fortune now
Rekubit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 13:53:59
Remember when cutting the cable cord and switching to streaming services was supposed to save you money?
We're quite a few years into the streaming revolution, in which big companies and Hollywood studios invested billions into new streaming services, many with a plus sign in their names. We're talking about Netflix, Disney+, Apple TV+, Paramount+, Peacock, Max, Hulu and Amazon Prime Video, plus smaller niche brands like Shudder and Acorn TV. Traditional broadcast networks and some cable channels are still making new shows, but if you're looking for the most Emmy-nominated, high-profile series with the biggest stars attached, you've got to start your internet connection.
It's all well and good if you like binge-watching, but have you checked your monthly subscription bills lately? Because those charges for Peacock and Disney+ might be quite a bit higher than they were when you signed up.
When platforms like Disney+ and Apple TV+ first arrived, they offered bargain-basement prices for monthly subscriptions to lure consumers into the fold before increasing rates. Since paying for "Bluey" and "Ted Lasso" is already a line item on your budget, you may have missed that fees have been slowly (and sometimes quickly) increasing at almost every service. You want Hulu, and you want it without ads? Well, that will run you a steep $18.99 a month by October, after the latest hike on all Disney services takes effect. Back when ad-free Hulu was introduced in 2015, it cost only $11.99.
Just take a look at the current and upcoming prices of all the major streamers, bundles and new sports-only app Venu, expected this month.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
So everything's more expensive. That must mean all the streamers are better than ever, right? Well, in a lot of cases the number of new shows a year has fallen since peak streaming in 2019 and 2020. But why have companies been able to charge us more for their content while simultaneously canceling some of our favorite shows and cutting back on new ones?
Streamers like Netflix want you to watch ads
The answer, of course, is all in the money. "Streamflation," as some have dubbed it, is part of the general inflation of consumer goods that has been plaguing the U.S. economy. But for the entertainment industry, it's more than that. For years, streaming was seen by consumers as a cheaper alternative to cable and a potential cash cow by media companies. Then, in 2022, Netflix saw a drop in subscribers that sent the entire industry into a tailspin that resulted in layoffs, cost-cutting moves, consumer price increases, bundling and ad-supported tiers on services that had claimed they'd never have commercial breaks but now needed an extra source of revenue.
So as part of that mad scramble − after they realized there are only so many people who might want to subscribe to a streaming service − Netflix and its competitors have raised prices, especially on ad-free tiers. The reason? To push you into cheaper, ad-supported options, which makes sense only when you consider that the more eyeballs they get on their content, the higher the rates they can charge advertisers.
It's all about the bundle
The high prices on individual services mark another strategy shift to encourage consumers to sign up for bundles, like the Disney and Hulu bundle and even those combining rivals, like the Max/Disney+/Hulu bundle or Comcast's Xfinity Streamsaver, which combines Peacock, Netflix and Apple TV+. When you can get ad-free Disney+ with your Hulu for just $1 more than ad-free Hulu alone, why wouldn't you go for it? It's the Supersize Me of streaming content.
Research tells streamers that bundle subscribers are much less likely to cancel services than those who opt for stand-alone services, a costly pattern known as "churn" that requires marketing dollars to replace them.
What's next for streaming? More bundles, ads and higher prices
I've got bad news for you if you're not into ads, bundles or shelling out more cash for fewer shows: These business trends aren't going anywhere. Even if some people are canceling in response, not everyone will.
"Consumer tolerance for price increases varies widely. Typically, around 30% to 40% of subscribers may consider canceling their subscriptions in response to a price hike," says Catalina Skramstad, senior VP of marketing and partnerships at streaming analytics firm NPAW.
They're retaining enough subscribers and (some services are) making enough revenue that Wall Street has been happier since these strategies have been deployed, and everybody likes to jump on the bandwagon. We're likely to see more services bundled together, more price increases, and increased emphasis on ad-supported tiers (such as on Amazon, where regular subscribers suddenly found themselves watching ads unless they opted to pay more). This is the new status quo in the streaming world.
That is, until the next boom or bust changes everything again.
veryGood! (8365)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Senate 2020: In Kansas, a Democratic Climate Hawk Closes in on a Republican Climate Skeptic
- California Utility Says Clean Energy Will Replace Power From State’s Last Nuclear Plant
- OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush said in 2021 he'd broken some rules in design of Titan sub that imploded
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Massachusetts’ Ambitious Clean Energy Bill Jolts Offshore Wind Prospects
- Financial Industry Faces Daunting Transformation for Climate Deal to Succeed
- Yes, the big news is Trump. Test your knowledge of everything else in NPR's news quiz
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Afghan evacuee child with terminal illness dies while in federal U.S. custody
Ranking
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Kids housed in casino hotels? It's a workaround as U.S. sees decline in foster homes
- America Now Has 27.2 Gigawatts of Solar Energy: What Does That Mean?
- Oil Pipelines or Climate Action? Trudeau Walks a Political Tightrope in Canada
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit immigration arrests, ruling against states
- Senate 2020: In Kansas, a Democratic Climate Hawk Closes in on a Republican Climate Skeptic
- The Best Memorial Day Sales 2023: Sephora, Nordstrom Rack, Wayfair, Kate Spade, Coach, J.Crew, and More
Recommendation
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
Don’t Gut Coal Ash Rules, Communities Beg EPA at Hearing
McCarthy says he supports House resolutions to expunge Trump's impeachments
His baby gene editing shocked ethicists. Now he's in the lab again
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Huntington's spreads like 'fire in the brain.' Scientists say they've found the spark
How Late Actor Ray Stevenson Is Being Honored in His Final Film Role
Kids can't all be star athletes. Here's how schools can welcome more students to play